<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TechnicalRx</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technicalrx.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technicalrx.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization and Marketing, Webmaster Services, and Website Hosting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>April 2012 Google Webmaster Report</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/april-2012-google-webmaster-report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/april-2012-google-webmaster-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 19:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a monthly recap of the changes made to Google that impact webmasters and SEO. Before we give the recap, I wanted to pull out of the WebmasterWorld thread the three things webmasters are talking about right now in terms of Google&#8217;s search results changes. They include:  Long Tail Sites Seeing Huge Fluctuations In Google Traffic [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a monthly recap of the changes made to Google that impact webmasters and SEO. Before we give the recap, I wanted to pull out of the <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4435785.htm">WebmasterWorld</a> thread the three things webmasters are talking about right now in terms of Google&#8217;s search results changes. They include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Long Tail Sites Seeing Huge Fluctuations In Google Traffic</li>
<li>E-Commerce Sites Not Ranking As Well</li>
<li>Google&#8217;s Localization Changed (Google Venice)</li>
</ul>
<p>In the past thirty days, the most important topics include the <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-panda-34-14926.html">Panda 3.4 update</a>, Matt Cutts announcing an <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-over-seo-update-14887.html">overly SEO penalty</a> and <a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-link-network-14932.html">big blog network penalty</a>.</p>
<p>Here are the stories that I pulled out over the past month which are important and related to Google SEO topics:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-panda-34-14926.html">Google Panda 3.4 Rollout</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-over-seo-update-14887.html">Cutts: Google To Target Overly SEO&#8217;ed Sites Within Weeks</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-link-network-14932.html">Google Penalizes Blog Networks, Did SEOs Use It To Hurt Competitors?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-update-march12-14881.html">Updated: New Panda Refresh? Google Update Happening&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-traffic-change-14849.html">Google Webmaster Tools Notifying Of Traffic Drops</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-panda-messages-14846.html">Panda Notifications Being Sent Via Google Webmasters Tools? Not Yet</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-tools-crawl-errors-14867.html">New Google Webmaster Tools Crawl Errors Confuses</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-ssl-worldwide-14836.html">Google Rolling Out SSL Default Worldwide</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-free-host-ban-tips-14842.html">Google Offers Free Hosts Advice On Being Penalty Free</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-tools-crawl-errors-data-14895.html">Using The API To Get More Google Webmaster Tools Crawl Error Data</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-play-navigation-14931.html">Search, Images, Maps &amp; Now Google Play</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/geo-sitemaps-gone-14941.html">Google Retired Geo Sitemap Support</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-new-tld-myth-14878.html">Google: New Top Level Domains (TLD) Will Not Help Rankings</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/firefox-google-ssl-no-referrer-14913.html">Not Provided To Spike When Firefox Adds Google SSL As Default</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-organic-paid-study-14942.html">Google: Want More Organic Traffic? Buy Search Ads</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-next-generation-14886.html">Google&#8217;s Amit Singhal: Freebase Entities Grows From 12M To 200M</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-money-stupid-14919.html">Google: When Search Results Suck, It&#8217;s Because We&#8217;re Stupid</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-communication-messages-14837.html">Google On Pace To Hit Over 4 Million Messages To Webmasters This Year</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-pagination-seo-14865.html">Video: SEO Pagination By Google</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/google-webmaster-youtube-channel-14936.html">450 Videos &amp; 7 Million Views On Google Webmaster YouTube Channel</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.seroundtable.com/search-quality-meeting-14868.html">Video Of Inside A Search Quality Meeting</a></li>
<li>*article from SEO Round Table</li>
</ul>
<p>Forum discussion at <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/google/4435785.htm">WebmasterWorld</a>.</p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/april-2012-google-webmaster-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>40 Google Panda Changes for February</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/40-google-panda-changes-for-february/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/40-google-panda-changes-for-february/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Search quality highlights: 40 changes for February 2/27/12 &#124; 11:30:00 AM From Goolge&#8217;s Blog: This month we have many improvements to celebrate. With 40 changes reported, that marks a new record for our monthly series on search quality. Most of the updates rolled out earlier this month, and a handful are actually rolling out today and tomorrow. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/search-quality-highlights-40-changes.html">Search quality highlights: 40 changes for February</a></h3>
<p>2/27/12 | 11:30:00 AM</p>
<p>From Goolge&#8217;s Blog:</p>
<div>
<p>This month we have many improvements to celebrate. With 40 changes reported, that marks a new record for our <a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/12/search-quality-highlights-new-monthly.html">monthly series</a> on search quality. Most of the updates rolled out earlier this month, and a handful are actually rolling out today and tomorrow. We continue to improve many of our systems, including related searches, sitelinks, autocomplete, UI elements, indexing, synonyms, SafeSearch and more. Each individual change is subtle and important, and over time they add up to a radically improved search engine.</p>
<p>Here’s the list for February:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>More coverage for related searches.</strong> [launch codename “Fuzhou”] This launch brings in a new data source to help generate the “Searches related to” section, increasing coverage significantly so the feature will appear for more queries. This section contains search queries that can help you refine what you’re searching for.</li>
<li><strong>Tweak to categorizer for expanded sitelinks. </strong>[launch codename “Snippy”, project codename “Megasitelinks”] This improvement adjusts a signal we use to try and identify duplicate snippets. We were applying a categorizer that wasn’t performing well for our expanded sitelinks, so we’ve stopped applying the categorizer in those cases. The result is more relevant sitelinks.</li>
<li><strong>Less duplication in expanded sitelinks. </strong>[launch codename “thanksgiving”, project codename “Megasitelinks”] We’ve adjusted signals to reduce duplication in the snippets for<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/evolution-of-sitelinks-expanded-and.html">expanded sitelinks</a>. Now we generate relevant snippets based more on the page content and less on the query.</li>
<li><strong>More consistent thumbnail sizes on results page.</strong> We’ve adjusted the thumbnail size for most image content appearing on the results page, providing a more consistent experience across result types, and also across mobile and tablet. The new sizes apply to rich snippet results for recipes and applications, movie posters, shopping results, book results, news results and more.</li>
<li><strong>More locally relevant predictions in YouTube.</strong> [project codename “Suggest”] We’ve improved the ranking for predictions in YouTube to provide more locally relevant queries. For example, for the query [lady gaga in ] performed on the US version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in times square], but for the same search performed on the Indian version of YouTube, we might predict [lady gaga in India].</li>
<li><strong>More accurate detection of official pages.</strong> [launch codename “WRE”] We’ve made an adjustment to how we detect official pages to make more accurate identifications. The result is that many pages that were previously misidentified as official will no longer be.</li>
<li><strong>Refreshed per-URL country information.</strong> [Launch codename “longdew”, project codename “country-id data refresh”] We updated the country associations for URLs to use more recent data.</li>
<li><strong>Expand the size of our images index in Universal Search.</strong> [launch codename “terra”, project codename “Images Universal”] We launched a change to expand the corpus of results for which we show images in Universal Search. This is especially helpful to give more relevant images on a larger set of searches.</li>
<li><strong>Minor tuning of autocomplete policy algorithms.</strong> [project codename “Suggest”] We have a narrow set of <a href="http://support.google.com/websearch/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=106230">policies for autocomplete</a> for offensive and inappropriate terms. This improvement continues to refine the algorithms we use to implement these policies.</li>
<li><strong>“Site:” query update</strong> [launch codename “Semicolon”, project codename “Dice”] This change improves the ranking for queries using the “site:” operator by increasing the diversity of results.</li>
<li><strong>Improved detection for SafeSearch in Image Search.</strong> [launch codename "Michandro", project codename “SafeSearch”] This change improves our signals for detecting adult content in Image Search, aligning the signals more closely with the signals we use for our other search results.</li>
<li><strong>Interval based history tracking for indexing.</strong> [project codename “Intervals”] This improvement changes the signals we use in document tracking algorithms.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to foreign language synonyms.</strong> [launch codename “floating context synonyms”, project codename “Synonyms”] This change applies an improvement we previously launched for English to all other languages. The net impact is that you’ll more often find relevant pages that include synonyms for your query terms.</li>
<li><strong>Disabling two old fresh query classifiers.</strong> [launch codename “Mango”, project codename “Freshness”] As search evolves and new signals and classifiers are applied to rank search results, sometimes old algorithms get outdated. This improvement disables two old classifiers related to query freshness.</li>
<li><strong>More organized search results for Google Korea.</strong> [launch codename “smoothieking”, project codename “Sokoban4”] This significant improvement to search in Korea better organizes the search results into sections for news, blogs and homepages.</li>
<li><strong>Fresher images.</strong> [launch codename “tumeric”] We’ve adjusted our signals for surfacing fresh images. Now we can more often surface fresh images when they appear on the web.</li>
<li><strong>Update to the Google bar.</strong> [project codename “Kennedy”] We continue to iterate in our efforts to deliver a beautifully simple experience across Google products, and as part of that this month we made further adjustments to the Google bar. The biggest change is that we’ve replaced the drop-down Google menu in the <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/next-stage-in-our-redesign.html">November redesign</a> with a consistent and expanded set of links running across the top of the page.</li>
<li><strong>Adding three new languages to classifier related to error pages. </strong>[launch codename "PNI", project codename "Soft404"] We have signals designed to detect crypto 404 pages (also known as “soft 404s”), pages that return valid text to a browser but the text only contain error messages, such as “Page not found.” It’s rare that a user will be looking for such a page, so it’s important we be able to detect them. This change extends a particular classifier to Portuguese, Dutch and Italian.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to travel-related searches. </strong>[launch codename “nesehorn”] We’ve made improvements to triggering for a variety of flight-related search queries. These changes improve the user experience for our <a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/12/see-flight-results-right-on-googlecom.html">Flight Search feature</a> with users getting more accurate flight results.</li>
<li><strong>Data refresh for related searches signal.</strong> [launch codename “Chicago”, project codename “Related Search”] One of the many signals we look at to generate the “Searches related to” section is the queries users type in succession. If users very often search for [apple] right after [banana], that’s a sign the two might be related. This update refreshes the model we use to generate these refinements, leading to more relevant queries to try.</li>
<li><strong>International launch of shopping rich snippets. </strong>[project codename “rich snippets”]<a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/11/rich-snippets-for-shopping-sites.html">Shopping rich snippets </a>help you more quickly identify which sites are likely to have the most relevant product for your needs, highlighting product prices, availability, ratings and review counts. This month we expanded shopping rich snippets globally (they were previously only available in the US, Japan and Germany).</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to Korean spelling.</strong> This launch improves spelling corrections when the user performs a Korean query in the wrong keyboard mode (also known as an &#8220;IME&#8221;, or input method editor). Specifically, this change helps users who mistakenly enter Hangul queries in Latin mode or vice-versa.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to freshness.</strong> [launch codename “iotfreshweb”, project codename “Freshness”] We’ve applied new signals which help us surface fresh content in our results even more quickly than before.</li>
<li><strong>Web History in 20 new countries.</strong> With Web History, you can browse and search over your search history and webpages you&#8217;ve visited. You will also get personalized search results that are more relevant to you, based on what you’ve searched for and which sites you’ve visited in the past. In order to deliver more relevant and personalized search results, we’ve launched Web History in Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Morocco, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Estonia, Kuwait, Iraq, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Nigeria, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Bosnia and Herzegowina, Azerbaijan, Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Moldova, and Ghana. Web History is turned on only for people who have a Google Account and previously enabled Web History.</li>
<li><strong>Improved snippets for video channels. </strong>Some search results are links to channels with many different videos, whether on mtv.com, Hulu or YouTube. We’ve had a feature for a while now that displays snippets for these results including direct links to the videos in the channel, and this improvement increases quality and expands coverage of these rich “decorated” snippets. We’ve also made some improvements to our backends used to generate the snippets.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to ranking for local search results.</strong> [launch codename “Venice”] This improvement improves the triggering of Local Universal results by relying more on the ranking of our main search results as a signal.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to English spell correction.</strong> [launch codename “Kamehameha”] This change improves spelling correction quality in English, especially for rare queries, by making one of our scoring functions more accurate.</li>
<li><strong>Improvements to coverage of News Universal.</strong> [launch codename “final destination”] We’ve fixed a bug that caused News Universal results not to appear in cases when our testing indicates they’d be very useful.</li>
<li><strong>Consolidation of signals for spiking topics.</strong> [launch codename “news deserving score”, project codename “Freshness”] We use a number of signals to detect when a new topic is spiking in popularity. This change consolidates some of the signals so we can rely on signals we can compute in realtime, rather than signals that need to be processed offline. This eliminates redundancy in our systems and helps to ensure we can continue to detect spiking topics as quickly as possible.</li>
<li><strong>Better triggering for Turkish weather search feature.</strong> [launch codename “hava”] We’ve tuned the signals we use to decide when to present Turkish users with the weather search feature. The result is that we’re able to provide our users with the weather forecast right on the results page with more frequency and accuracy.</li>
<li><strong>Visual refresh to account settings page.</strong> We completed a visual refresh of the <a href="https://www.google.com/settings/">account settings page</a>, making the page more consistent with the rest of our constantly <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/06/evolving-google-design-and-experience.html">evolving design</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Panda update. </strong>This launch refreshes data in the Panda system, making it more accurate and more sensitive to recent changes on the web.</li>
<li><strong>Link evaluation. </strong>We often use characteristics of links to help us figure out the topic of a linked page. We have changed the way in which we evaluate links; in particular, we are turning off a method of link analysis that we used for several years. We often rearchitect or turn off parts of our scoring in order to keep our system maintainable, clean and understandable.</li>
<li><strong>SafeSearch update.</strong> We have updated how we deal with adult content, making it more accurate and robust. Now, irrelevant adult content is less likely to show up for many queries.</li>
<li><strong>Spam update. </strong>In the process of investigating some potential spam, we found and fixed some weaknesses in our spam protections.</li>
<li><strong>Improved local results.</strong> We launched a new system to find results from a user’s city more reliably. Now we’re better able to detect when both queries and documents are local to the user.</li>
</ul>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px;"><br />
</span></p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/40-google-panda-changes-for-february/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Google’s Results Better After A Year Of Panda Updates?</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/are-google%e2%80%99s-results-better-after-a-year-of-panda-updates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/are-google%e2%80%99s-results-better-after-a-year-of-panda-updates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recent google updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technicalrx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to believe that it’s already been a year since Google first launched the Panda update. OK, who am I kidding? It feels like an eternity ago. But it’s been a year. How much work have you done on your site to comply with Panda in that amount of time? Now that you’ve had [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to believe that it’s already been a year since Google first launched the Panda update. OK, who am I kidding? It feels like an eternity ago. But it’s been a year. How much work have you done on your site to comply with Panda in that amount of time?</p>
<p><strong>Now that you’ve had a year to get to know it, how do you think Google has done with the Panda update? Was your site affected? For better or for worse? Do you think Google did a good job in making search results higher in quality and relevancy? </strong></p>
<p>Earlier this month, when Google ran down its publicly known <a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2012/02/17-search-quality-highlights-january.html">algorithmic changes for the month of January</a>, it mentioned what still appears to be the most recent change to Panda. It said:</p>
<p><em>“We improved how Panda interacts with our indexing and ranking systems, making it more integrated into our pipelines. We also released a minor update to refresh the data for Panda.”</em></p>
<p>This change had actually been confirmed in January, but was spelled out one more time (as much as Google will in fact spell it out). Just to make sure this was in fact the most recent Panda-related adjustment, Google was asked. A spokesperson for the company responded: “As mentioned in January, we’re continuing to improve how Panda interacts with our indexing and ranking systems, making it more integrated into our pipelines.”</p>
<p>So, it sounds like the improvements are still ongoing, but no major Panda update since that particular announcement.</p>
<p>This list has been referenced plenty of times by myself and others discussing the Panda update, but as Google tweaks it, these things will continue to be important to keep in mind. Possibly even more than ever, considering that it’s so much more “integrated into the pipelines”. It’s the list of questions that provides “guidance” on how Google looks at the issue of search quality.</p>
<ul>
<li>Would you trust the information presented in this article?</li>
<li>Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?</li>
<li>Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?</li>
<li>Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?</li>
<li>Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?</li>
<li>Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?</li>
<li>Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?</li>
<li>Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?</li>
<li>How much quality control is done on content?</li>
<li>Does the article describe both sides of a story?</li>
<li>Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?</li>
<li>Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?</li>
<li>Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?</li>
<li>For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?</li>
<li>Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?</li>
<li>Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?</li>
<li>Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?</li>
<li>Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?</li>
<li>Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?</li>
<li>Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?</li>
<li>Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?</li>
<li>Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?</li>
<li>Would users complain when they see pages from this site?</li>
</ul>
<p>For a comprehensive look back (and forward) at the ongoing Panda saga, you may find this <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/tag/panda">Panda page useful</a>. It basically is dedicated to Panda-related stories. Sure, in essence, it’s basically a tag page, but it kind of takes on a life of its own.  It includes the important info, as well as some of the more fun things, like Panda bread, parody videos and infographics.  If you&#8217;re at all interested in Google, their updates and how it can affect your SEO, check it out.  And hey, if you&#8217;ve already read this far, you might as well read that too!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/are-google%e2%80%99s-results-better-after-a-year-of-panda-updates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s New Algorithm Update Impacts 35% Of Searches</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/google%e2%80%99s-new-algorithm-update-impacts-35-of-searches/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/google%e2%80%99s-new-algorithm-update-impacts-35-of-searches/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thursday, November 3rd, 2011 Today, Google announced a change to its search algorithm that the company says will impact 35% of Web searches. The change builds on top of its previous “Caffeine” update in order to deliver more up-to-date and relevant search results, specifically those in areas where freshness matters. This includes things like recent events, hot topics, current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Thursday, November 3rd, 2011</div>
<div>Today, Google <a href="http://insidesearch.blogspot.com/2011/11/giving-you-fresher-more-recent-search.html">announced</a> a change to its search algorithm that the company says will impact 35% of Web searches. The change builds on top of <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/08/google-caffeine/">its previous “Caffeine” update</a> in order to deliver more up-to-date and relevant search results, specifically those in areas where freshness matters. This includes things like recent events, hot topics, current reviews and breaking news items.</div>
<div>
<p>Google says that the new algorithm knows that different types of searches have different freshness needs, and weighs them accordingly. For example, a search for a favorite recipe posted a few years ago may still be popular enough to rank highly, but searches for an <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=occupy+oakland+protest">unfolding news story</a> or the latest review of the iPhone 4S should bring the newer, fresher content first, followed by older results.</p>
<p><a href="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/freshness_blog.png" rel="lightbox[446701]"><img src="http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/freshness_blog.png?w=640" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>For searches about recent events and news, Google may now show search results towards the top of the page that are only minutes old, the company says. For regularly occurring events, like the<a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=presidential+election">Presidential election</a>, the Oscars, a football game, company earnings, etc., Google knows that you’re likely interested in the most recent event, even if you don’t specify keywords indicating that.</p>
<p>That means a search for “Apple earnings” won’t (in theory) require you to also type in “Q4 2011″ in order to see the latest information. It will be implied that you <em>meant</em> this latest quarter, without the need for the extra text. Of course, Google was already ranking news items and stock symbols at the top of the page when users performed financial-related searches or searches for current information, but this algorithm change has an impact on the organic search results, too, not those from the verticals (search, finance, images, etc.) which have been integrated into Google’s <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/05/universal-search-best-answer-is-still.html">Universal search</a>.</p>
<p>For items that see regular updates, like consumer electronics reviews, reviews of <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=subaru+impreza+reviews">a particular kind of car</a> and more, Google will also feature the most current and up-to-date information above the rest.</p>
<p>This “freshness update,” is an extension of <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/28/google-caffeine-faster-search-index/">what Google begin last year</a> with Caffeine, an under-the-hood improvement that, among other things, helped Google index content quicker, so results were more realtime. This year, Google also brought out its <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/05/05/google%E2%80%99s-panda-update-cripples-open-publishing-competition/">Panda update</a>, which was meant to decrease the rankings of so-called “content farms” – SEO-optimized entities that critics said filled Google with low-quality results.</p>
<p>Now, it’s clear that Google understands that the most relevant search result is more often the one that’s relevant <em>now</em> – the one that’s bringing you new information. The update’s impact on Google Search is fairly substantial, with Google claiming that roughly 35% of search results will be affected by the changes.</p>
<p>Google used to have a search vertical specifically for the most recent updates at www.google.com/realtime, where it was indexing Twitter updates. However, when the contract with Twitter expired, <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2011/07/04/realtime-search-on-hiatus-while-google-and-twitter-figure-themselves-out/">Google shuttered the site</a> (it now redirects to the Google homepage). Google said at the time that it planned to re-open the site with Google+ search results alongside other realtime sources of information. But with the new Google search update, a specific vertical for realtime information feels less necessary.</p>
</div>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/google%e2%80%99s-new-algorithm-update-impacts-35-of-searches/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs the RIAA</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/google-vs-the-riaa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/google-vs-the-riaa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RIAA vs Google       After the lively discussion on Google’s piracy liabilities, today the company has to deal again with piracy and confront the almighty Recording Industry Association of America, too. This is about Google’s MP3 Music Download Pro app. This application was designed by the company especially for Android and allows users [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="100%">
<h1>RIAA vs Google</h1>
</td>
<td><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></p>
<div> </div>
</td>
<td align="middle"> </td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div>After the lively discussion on Google’s piracy liabilities, today the company has to deal again with piracy and confront the almighty Recording Industry Association of America, too. This is about Google’s MP3 Music Download Pro app.</p>
<div><img title="Google%E2%80%99s-Refusal-to-Comply-With-RIAA%E2%80%99s-Demands-on-MP3-App.jpg" src="http://www.p2pon.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google%E2%80%99s-Refusal-to-Comply-With-RIAA%E2%80%99s-Demands-on-MP3-App.jpg" alt="Google%E2%80%99s-Refusal-to-Comply-With-RIAA%E2%80%99s-Demands-on-MP3-App.jpg" border="0" /></div>
<p>This application was designed by the company especially for Android and allows users to download music onto their smartphones. At the moment, the application is rated as the 5th most popular one on the entire Android Market. Of course, the anti-piracy outfit couldn’t like that. It has already sent a takedown notice to Google this past summer regarding this particular application, because it was clearly used for unauthorized purposes. In respond, Google claimed that it refused to remove the app from the Android Market. Still, the RIAA has some concerns with the company’s screening and takedown procedures. Entertainment industry still hopes that they’ll be improved.</p>
<p>In addition, Google is going to fulfill its promise to launch a new music store, and it has already invited media representatives to the big launch. Online reports reveal that the company has managed to close deals with 4 largest record labels, and if it is really so, Apple’s iTunes may get a rival. Nevertheless, the reports don’t mention what strategy Google has developed to lure users to purchase licensed music from their store.</p>
<p>According to some media reports, Google refused to take down the application because it believes that the app can also be used for legitimate purposes – for example, recently the screenshots were posted, showing how the app could be used to search for classical music. For some reason, they soon magically disappeared.</p>
<p>A couple months ago, Google claimed it has made significant progress on piracy liabilities by deleting illegal content from both its Autocomplete function and search results. Moreover, the company has already taken down a number of mobile applications facilitating copyright violation. The problem is that the takedown times are usually long, and the industry often sees the same or similar applications from the same developers re-appearing fast enough. In addition, the company is also accused of failing to screen and evaluate applications before uploading them.</p>
<p>At the moment, RIAA’s representative refused to comment whether the entertainment industry will launch a lawsuit against Google.</p>
</div>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/google-vs-the-riaa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Crack Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/hackers-crack-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/hackers-crack-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 02:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the last year, intruders have been able to crash through the company’s faith-based security in order to spend other users’ money. Meanwhile, Jobs’ Mob couldn’t stop them. The first reports of the incidents came in November 2010: one of the Apple support forum’s users claimed that someone had spent over $50 of his iTunes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the last year, intruders have been able to crash through the company’s faith-based security in order to spend other users’ money. Meanwhile, Jobs’ Mob couldn’t stop them.</p>
<p>The first reports of the incidents came in November 2010: one of the Apple support forum’s users claimed that someone had spent over $50 of his iTunes Store credit on iPhone apps, while his home address changed to some address in Towson, Maryland.</p>
<p>Later, the list of complaints grew as much as up to 700 posts, when a hacker or a number of them managed to spend iTunes gift card credit without permission. Apple had to refund some of its users, but not all of them – the company hasn’t given cash back to many, while acknowledging no wrongdoing or iTunes hacking.</p>
<p>The Apple religion claimed that Jobs’ Mob was the most secure software maker throughout the globe and only Windows-running devices could be hacked. Since Apple didn’t stop the hackers, they grew more sophisticated, with the users noticing that the purchases in question turned out to be applications from certain developers, including “gao jing,” known for application like Expert Guide for Black Ops or Game Guide for New Vegas.</p>
<p>The experts believed that the software purchased was all of Chinese origin, thus hinting that there was a way for rogue developers to get some cash off Apple. The latter appeared to have twigged that there might be something afoot and none of the applications were in the store.</p>
<p>Back in April, a number of users discovered that instead their money were making in-app purchases for a Sega game titled KingdomConquest, and it was clear to everyone that Sega was unlikely to make sales in such dodgy way. The intruders managed to “purchase” the free application on victims’ iTunes accounts, thus triggering the in-app purchases. Although Sega expressed a wish to investigate, it appeared that it was blocked by Apple, which refused to allow access to its users’ iTunes account data or any transaction histories.</p>
<p>Back this past June, the attacks started worsening, with Jobs’ Mob emails to users coming close to admitting that cash was taken from customer accounts without permission. Still, the company only refunded cash once, while customers hit during the second attack were told to go forth and multiply. Meanwhile, the hacks are getting more frequent. </p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/hackers-crack-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>+1 TechnicalRx</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/1-technicalrx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/1-technicalrx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 03:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please &#8220;+1&#8243; us if you like our site and our services! Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please &#8220;+1&#8243; us if you like our site and our services!  Thanks!</p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/1-technicalrx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TechnicalRx hosting capability gets more robust</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/technicalrx-hosting-capability-gets-more-robust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/technicalrx-hosting-capability-gets-more-robust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 03:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TechnicalRx can now provide even more robust enterprise grade hosting at a small business price. Our new hosting capabilities allow your own fully featured cpanel administration and the ability to utilize additional subdomains and addon domains, set up your own email accounts, or admin your own database. Manage every aspect of your website yourself or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Technical</span>Rx</strong> can now provide even more robust enterprise grade hosting at a small business price. Our new hosting capabilities allow your own fully featured cpanel administration and the ability to utilize additional subdomains and addon domains, set up your own email accounts, or admin your own database. Manage every aspect of your website yourself or let us do it for you. Dedicated IPs, private nameservers, and a 99.9% uptime.</p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/technicalrx-hosting-capability-gets-more-robust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New SEM client for TechnicalRx</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/new-sem-client-for-technicalrx/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/new-sem-client-for-technicalrx/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 04:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vetter Air; Air Conditioning and Heating Service, Repair &#38; Installation in the New Braunfels / San Antonio areas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vetterair.com" target="_blank">Vetter Air</a>; Air Conditioning and Heating Service, Repair &amp; Installation in the New Braunfels / San Antonio areas.</p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/new-sem-client-for-technicalrx/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo! Web Analytics battles Google Analytics For Enterprise Use</title>
		<link>http://www.technicalrx.com/yahoo-web-analytics-battles-google-analytics-for-enterprise-use/</link>
		<comments>http://www.technicalrx.com/yahoo-web-analytics-battles-google-analytics-for-enterprise-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 02:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TechnicalRx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technicalrx.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A latest study suggests that Yahoo could be outstandingly winning the battle with archrival Google in the free web analytics market, despite Google’s success in the small and medium sized business market, Yahoo Web Analytics surpasses its rival in several areas, and is a better fit for enterprises than Google Analytics, according to the CMS [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A latest study suggests that Yahoo could be outstandingly winning the battle with archrival Google in the free web analytics market, despite Google’s success in the small and medium sized business market, Yahoo Web Analytics surpasses its rival in several areas, and is a better fit for enterprises than Google Analytics, according to the CMS Watch Web Analytics Report 2009.</p>
<p>Areas where Yahoo excels over Google according to CMS Watch include:</p>
<p>Better access control options and simpler approach to multi-site analytics<br />
Larger default monthly page-view limits (200MM vs. 5MM – unless you have an active AdWords campaign)<br />
Access to traffic data: Both vendors retain the right to hold and use your web analytics data for their own purposes, but only Yahoo! gives you the ability to export out your raw, unaggregated data<br />
Longer historical availability of raw data<br />
Besides, despite the better analytics platform, Yahoo! still lacks features that could make it a perfect fit for all enterprise level needs:</p>
<p>“Ultimately, for some enterprises, neither Google nor Yahoo! make a good fit,” explained Tony Byrne CMS Watch founder, “and those buyers should consider fee-based web analytics solutions.” </p>
<div id="wpcr_respond_1"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.technicalrx.com/yahoo-web-analytics-battles-google-analytics-for-enterprise-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

